All things considered, this review is not an exaggeration. The concept of a movie based on a four-year-old sitcom would usually be destined for failure; but SATC defies the disappointing, gold-digging, shameless cliche-clinging of sitcom franchises and immediately becomes a feel-good classic. Joining the ranks of Pretty Woman, The Bodyguard, Dirty Dancing, Ghost and Sleepless in Seattle, the movie captures all the joy and pain of an immortal romance.
"I think every woman in Los Angeles is in this theater today," commented a thirty-something woman in the restroom after the movie. The theme of the day was "fabulous", with the almost-all female audience donning dresses and high heels for the big event. This wasn't a premier or an A-list screening, but for every woman in the audience it was a special event. It has been four years of wilderness since the final episode that left so many women feeling warm and satisfied, wiping their mascara-stained faces and smiling at their girlfriends with a nostalgic glow of contentment. However, it has not been four years without Carrie, Miranda, Charlotte and Samantha. It has been four years of re-watching the SATC DVD box set. And the movie was the best episode ever made, stretched wonderfully into 2 and a half delicious hours. Finally, the SATC generation was given its cake... and we ate the whole thing.
The moral of the story (...because there always is one) underlies every single exploration Carrie has ever made. At first, she thinks it is "love". But one thing that has been clear all along is that it is easy to fall in and out of love, to complain about love, to search for and give up on it, to relish and shun it, to philosophize and to compromise; love is not "never having to say you're sorry", like Samantha and Carrie in "Cover Girl" (Season 5, episode 4), but being able to say "I forgive you". Love is tough. It takes work. But when all is said and done... the most difficult task is not ending a relationship, but fighting for one. Carrie and the girls can weather the "for better", but what about the "for worse?" When do you flee, and when do you fight?
Girls are good at complaining about their friends' relationships; it's easy to hate Big and throw him out like dirty dishwater... but just because the fairytale has a few hiccups, doesn't mean it can't have a happily-ever-after.
Sex and the City has seen a generation of women through the good times and the bad times. Every woman in the audience today has felt a connection with the characters throughout the six seasons, and with each other. Today it transcended the silver screen and overflowed into the street. It walked home with them. It took them out to lunch. It encouraged them to order Cosmopolitans and feel sexy in their high heels.
Friday, May 30, 2008
Sex and the City the Movie: 5 million out of 10
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Sunday, April 27, 2008
GTA IV: Most Brazenly Violent Game Out-Violences Itself
Rockstar is the balls of the video game industry. Since its inception by the characteristically red-headed Scot, Dave Jones, in 1997, the game has taken the brunt of the debate over video game violence. And it's no wonder. What GTA did was take every imaginable suppressed human inclination toward violent actions and give them a space to play. If you ever imagined snipering people, stealing a car or running over pedestrians, this game gave you a place to run wild. And even if you had never imagined doing those things, you would after playing the game.
The critics believed that such wild imaginings would have practical repercussions - people would start pulling each other out of their cars and playing chicken with the police on the highway. Anyone exposed to this level of unrestrained, primitive, illogical street warfare would immediately become a sociopath. There is no evidence for such extreme thinking, and although we should admit that - for some unknown reason - playing GTA actually has a cathartic effect that both terrifies and excites the average, law-abiding citizen, it isn't a cult that will end with mass suicide. At least, there is no way of knowing that it will.
Still, despite being blamed by almost every parent and psychologist in the country for violent-inclinations in the human race, the makers of GTA have boldly chosen to ignore the disgruntled and take the game's concept to the most extreme level imaginable. It's almost as if they're inside the subconscious of the average gamer, and have been listening to all the terrible, scary thoughts that are quickly beaten down by the socially-installed conscience. If the social superhero is the super-ego, making sure that humans stay away from acting on their primitive desires by making them feel bad for even thinking about it, then GTA is the arch enemy trying to completely disrupt that plan.
If you ever played any of the GTA games and thought "my favorite part about this isn't really even the missions, it's the unrestrained killing-of-people" then don't think Rockstar wasn't listening. If you spent hours hunting the streets for pedestrians to run over, or secretly wished to see a little more blood... then Christmas has come early. April 29th, to be exact.
I consider myself to be a relatively stable human being. I know that I won't ever go about the streets murdering people or stealing cars, but if you think that you may be influenced - or pushed beyond the psychological boundaries that keep you in check - by GTA IV, then think about sticking to Mario. In fact, proof of psychological stability would be a damn sight better than whipping out your driving license to purchase a copy of the game. It might silence the horde who are about to go crazy over the newest, improved version of total-chaos-to-the-human-race, who are afraid that the things on the screen will immediately begin jumping out onto the streets and into their kids playgrounds . I can't say what people will do, but it seems like there's enough violence in the world for it not to notice another edition of GTA.
http://www.mahalo.com/GTA_IV_Leaked
Saturday, April 5, 2008
Curtis Richardson: 13-year-old, Shot Dead in Gang Territory
On March 17th, 13-year-old Curtis Richardson was shot dead in front of his home.
"He was walking with his friends when one of his friends threw up a gang sign and they came back and started shooting," said a 13-year-old school friend of Curtis.
A resident named Vincent said that he was one of the first on the scene. "I ran around here and checked his pulse. He had a pulse but he wasn't moving or nothing," said Vincent. Vincent said that his father was shot and killed across the street a few years ago.
In South Central Los Angeles, these crimes are part of everyday life. The area is geographically divided by gangs, with Richardson's house resting on the cusp of the divide between the Bloods and the Crips.
"I've been living in a war zone since 1987," said Sister Herron, a resident of South Central and leader of the Youth Advocacy Coalition.
Herron was joined by author and civil rights activist Earl Ofari Hutchinson on the street where Richardson was shot. After a 35 percent upsurge in homicides this year, this coalition of civil rights leaders were asking Los Angeles to put violence on hold for 40 hours. After being passed by Los Angeles city council, the moratorium started at 6:01 pm Friday, the day Dr. Martin Luther King Jnr. was assassinated 40 years ago. Sister Herron reminded the crowd of the many children and teenagers who were killed in just the last month.
So why don't kids get the message and stop joining gangs? Because it's a lot more complicated than it looks. It's not a case of "just saying no." It's a case of massive, grand-scale bullying and defying an accepted way of life. "I've got family members in gangs, friends," said one of the girls at the memorial. "I mean, it's possible, you don't have to gang bang, but it's hard."
For many teenagers in Los Angeles, joining a gang isn't a decision they get to make. They're pressured by friends and even family members, as some gangs have an ancestry that is hard to defy.
And the rules of gang warfare are even harder to defy. In fact, turning a blind eye to the symbols of gang territory can be dangerous or even deadly. The girls from Richardson's high school explained that even having dyed hair can be a dangerous flag in an area that is controlled by the blue Crips gang or the red Blood gang. "I could walk around the corner and I might not come back," said one girl, who has a wide red streak in her hair.
There have been numerous programs in Los Angeles to try and curb the gang violence that is segregating the city, but nothing offers an infalliable solution. The girls from Richardson's school were sceptical that things could ever change.
"Some people learn and some don’t."
"Some people change their lives and some people don’t."
No matter how many activists come into their neighborhood trying to spread a message of peace, life and death are still just blocks apart. The police still had to patrol Curtis Richardson's memorial so that mourners could gather there. There are still reports of murdered children, and officials announcing that the deaths were "gang-related." The scariest thing is that this isn't a new problem for Los Angeles; it's become a trade mark.
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Monday, March 31, 2008
101 Freeway Death: The Romeo and Juliet of Hollywood?

Police were investigating another freeway shooting in Long Beach when the incident occurred; part of a strain of freeway shootings involving road rage.
This story sounds like a Shakespearean tragedy; a Romeo and Juliet of Hollywood. What could have moved this young couple to such extremes?
Also, why is everyone shooting each other on the freeway?
Some experts say that weather has a correlation to crime. In warm weather, crime rates go up. It's a pretty insignificant correlation; as if sunshine makes people crazy.
The more accurate explanation is the simplest. Los Angeles is a difficult place to live. The divide between the rich and the poor leaves one half bitter and the other half scared. The tension is as clear as the transience and superficiality of the city. Nothing lasts. Not even the people. They either move up, into the hills, or down, into the dirt. There is no in between, no comfort in limbo. There is Compton, and there is Beverly Hills, and both are perpetuated by the stereotypes that live in the mind of Angelenos. This is a tough place to call home. As Jack Kerouac wrote: "L.A is the loneliest and most brutal of American cities."
Lonely. Brutal.
A fight for survival on a physical and spiritual level.
In a city of extremes, life and death are executed extremely. There is so much drama, and so little solace.
Dedicated to Virginia Castillo and Marlon Gordillo Sical. May they rest in peace.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Shootings in Hollywood
My bedroom window overlooks the Sunset Boulevard off-ramp where the man was shot and killed on Wednesday. On Tuesday night, as I was lying in bed, I heard two shots. Police sirens followed, and it was reported in the morning that one man was killed and the two suspects fled on foot. Residents tried to administer first aid to the man, but were unsuccessful. Last night I heard two gunshots again, fired sequentially as if two rounds were pumped from the same gun. It was the same type of shooting that I had heard on Tuesday. However, this time I heard no sirens. I am waiting for the police to contact me for more information about last night's gunfire. The LAPD confirmed that no name has been released for the man killed on Tuesday night. There are no media reports. The LA Times homicide blog has not been updated with his information. Initial television reports, from ABC, claimed that the man was thought to have been homeless.
I don't think of this area as "rough", and aside from one experience that made me feel uncomfortable involving a man running across the street at night to tell my boyfriend I should be walking on the inside of the street for protection... I have never been deterred from walking home at night.
But hearing gunshots before you go to sleep at night might be the last straw for my naivety. Twice in one week. I only hope that no-one was killed last night, and that this won't become a regular event.
Saturday, March 29, 2008
The NFL Stadium Threatening Lynwood Residents; What's Happening? April 14th Court Date
LYNWOOD, Calif. – For three years, Lynwood residents have been living in the shadow of an invisible football stadium. They have seen the value of their properties decrease, and the area has become a real-estate limbo since plans for an NFL stadium were mapped over their zip code. They don’t know whether to make themselves comfortable, or prepare to evacuate.
Silvia Villegas has decided to “wait it out.” She has lived in her house, on the west side of Atlantic Avenue within the designated stadium zone, for six years. She has seen city projects stagnate. The empty apartment complex at the end of her street was once remodelled to be a women’s center, and then an old-folks home, but was never opened, according to Villegas. Its windows have been boarded up since children started throwing rocks at them. Around the corner from her house, Ham Park is still a fenced-off dirt pile rather than a place for her children to play.
“Nothing gets finished,” said Villegas.
Three years have passed since each of these projects began. The contract for the apartment complex was passed in and out of enthusiastic hands, the shops were torn down to make way for the park, and residents in the stadium area were told to sell their homes early to make the most profit before the NFL arrives. But nothing has come to be.
According to Villegas, her neighbors have been trying to sell their house for a year. But no-one wants to buy property that is ear-marked to be torn down. And the football stadium that threatens five schools and 1000 homes has been weighing on the public mind since its inception behind the closed doors of the council chambers.
Since then, the council members involved were recalled and indicted for misappropriation of public funds, and the new faces at City Hall placed a preliminary injunction on the redevelopment contract. For six months, Residents have been holding their breath for word on whether or not the project will continue.
But on April 14th, they may be given an answer. “That day, the judge will decide whether or not the contract is enforceable,” said Mayor Pro-Tem Aide Castro. The redevelopment contract was amended at a meeting the former council members held in October 2007, after they had been recalled, which may mean that the contract is void. “Our stand is that the contract that was passed by the recalled council is not enforceable,” said Castro. “When you are recalled, you lose your powers.”
Aside from a monthly newsletter from City Hall listing events and menial announcements, Villegas and her neighbors have heard little from the new council, and nothing about the stadium that threatens to uproot them.
Political Mudslinging in Lynwood; Crooked Campaigns
LYNWOOD, Calif. – Political action committees in Lynwood pulled out all the stops in the past two elections, rummaging through candidates’ pasts and publishing campaign material in order to sway voters. The methods were effective, but the committees don’t always play by the rules.
During the November 2007 election, a committee called Voters Against Corruption used a doctored photograph to accuse candidate Jim Morton of encouraging prostitution at his Long Beach Boulevard motel. According to Silvia Ortiz, who claims to have “provided the people” to pose as prostitutes for the photograph, Morton’s political rival Aide Castro helped the committee develop the anti-Morton campaign.
“Sometimes you get caught up with wanting to win so bad that the human side comes out,” said Ortiz. Ortiz confessed to her role in staging the photographs during the public comment section of a City Council meeting in February. She said she warned Castro that she would be making the confession and told her to “do the right thing” and make amends for her role in tarnishing Morton’s reputation.
“Maybe in a few years she’ll see that I did her a favor,” said Ortiz, who helps market Lynwood’s campaigns by going door-to-door and distributing campaign material. Ortiz said she is no longer on speaking terms with Castro.
The rules of the Fair Political Practices Commission state that candidates can only be involved with committees if the involvement is clear in the committee’s name. Castro spearheaded her own committee during the November election, called the Committee to Elect Aide Castro, and claims to have had no involvement with Voters Against Corruption, other than their support.
When asked to provide the names of Voters Against Corruption committee members, Castro refused. “They wouldn’t appreciate me disclosing that information,” she said. “They would be very upset with me.”
The committee was established by Christopher Robles, a former Montebello City Council candidate who donated frequently to past political-action committees at state and local government level, including the Los Angeles County Democratic Central Committee. Robles could not be contacted for comment as his phone line has been disconnected and he has moved from Montebello.
The deadline to file campaign finance statements was Jan. 31, and Voters Against Corruption have yet to submit their consolidated campaign disclosure form. Robles could be subject to a $5,000 penalty for breaking the regulations of the Political Reform Act of 1974, according to Roman Porter of the Fair Political Practices Commission.
Political action committees are easy to establish and can be quickly dissolved. It only takes one person to form a committee, and the identities of the members are protected until documents have been completed and Public Information Act requests can be made.
A campaign piece produced during the recall election in September 2007 accusing Castro of drug smuggling was attributed to a committee that denied any connection to the piece and claimed a separate party had unlawfully used their name. According to Ortiz, Fernando Pedroza was responsible for the piece. Pedroza was one of the council members being recalled and Castro’s cousin.
“We’re supposed to be doing this the democratic way,” said Ortiz, who claims that Lynwood’s elections are convoluted by the propaganda produced by political-action committees. “It’s not what voters want; it’s whose got the money to sway the vote.” And so long as committees continue to side-step campaign laws, it will be difficult to pin-point who is doing the swaying.